Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 2024 Apr 20.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648935

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis whose clinical and topographic distribution requires differential diagnosis, or the possible association with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), requiring patch testing (PT) as part of the diagnostic procedure. OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiological, clinical, and allergic profile of patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of psoriasis undergoing PT and compare them with patients with a diagnosis of ACD at the end of the diagnostic process. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with data from REIDAC from 2018 through 2023 of selected patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis and/or ACD. RESULTS: A total of 11 502 patients were included, 513 of whom had been diagnosed with primary or secondary psoriasis, 3640 with ACD, and 108 with both diseases. Men were more predominant in the groups of patients with psoriasis, psoriasis + ACD, and lesions were more predominantly seen in the hands with little association with atopic factors vs the ACD group. The rate of positivity in PT to the 2022 Spanish battery of allergens was lower in the group with psoriasis only in 27% of the patients. The most common allergens found in the psoriasis group were also the most common ones found in the overall ACD population. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 36.2% of psoriatic patients tested positive in PT to the 2022 Spanish battery of allergens, which proved that this association is not uncommon. Overall, psoriatic patients had a higher mean age, were more predominantly men, and showed more hand involvement.

2.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 2024 Mar 29.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556197

RESUMO

After the meeting held by the Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group (GEIDAC) back in October 2021, changes were suggested to the Spanish standard series patch testing. Hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2% pet.), textile dye mixt (6.6% pet.), linalool hydroperoxide (1% pet.), and limonene hydroperoxide (0.3% pet.) were, then, added to the series that agreed upon in 2016. Ethyldiamine and phenoxyethanol were excluded. Methyldibromoglutaronitrile, the mixture of sesquiterpene lactones, and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene (Lyral) were alo added to the extended Spanish series of 2022.

3.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 115(4): T331-T340, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331170

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological surveillance of contact dermatitis is one of the objectives of the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy. Knowing whether the prevalence of positive tests to the different allergens changes over time is important for this monitoring process. OBJECTIVES: To describe the various temporary trends in allergen positivity in the GEIDAC standard series from 2018 through December 31, 2022. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational trial of consecutive patients analyzed via patch tests as part of the study of possible allergic contact dermatitises collected prospectively within the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy. The data was analyzed using 2 statistical tests: one homogeneity test (to describe the changes seen over time) and one trend test (to see whether the changes described followed a linear trend). RESULTS: A total of 11327 patients were included in the study. Overall, the allergens associated with a highest sensitization were nickel sulfate, methylisothiazolinone, cobalt chloride, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, and fragrance mix i. A statistically significant decrease was found in the percentage of methylisothiazolinone positive tests across the study years with an orderly trend. CONCLUSIONS: Although various changes were seen in the sensitizations trends to several allergens of the standard testing, it became obvious that a high sensitization to nickel, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and fragrances mix i remained. Only a significant downward trend was seen for methylisothiazolinone.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Atópica , Humanos , Alérgenos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tiazóis
4.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 2024 Feb 19.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38382750

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis whose clinical and topographic distribution requires differential diagnosis, or the possible association with allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), requiring patch testing (PT) as part of the diagnostic procedure. OBJECTIVES: To describe the epidemiological, clinical, and allergic profile of patients with a primary or secondary diagnosis of psoriasis undergoing PT and compare them with patients with a diagnosis of ACD at the end of the diagnostic process. METHODS: Cross-sectional study with data from REIDAC from 2018 through 2023 of selected patients with a diagnosis of psoriasis and/or ACD. RESULTS: A total of 11 502 patients were included, 513 of whom had been diagnosed with primary or secondary psoriasis, 3640 with ACD, and 108 with both diseases. Men were more predominant in the groups of patients with psoriasis, psoriasis+ACD, and lesions were more predominantly seen in the hands with little association with atopic factors vs the ACD group. The rate of positivity in PT to the 2022 Spanish battery of allergens was lower in the group with psoriasis only in 27% of the patients. The most common allergens found in the psoriasis group were also the most common ones found in the overall ACD population. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 36.2% of psoriatic patients tested positive in PT to the 2022 Spanish battery of allergens, which proved that this association is not uncommon. Overall, psoriatic patients had a higher mean age, were more predominantly men, and showed more hand involvement.

5.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 115(4): 331-340, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38061453

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The epidemiological surveillance of contact dermatitis is one of the objectives of the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy. Knowing whether the prevalence of positive tests to the different allergens changes over time is important for this monitoring process. OBJECTIVES: To describe the various temporary trends in allergen positivity in the GEIDAC standard series from 2018 through December 31, 2022. METHODS: This was a multicenter, observational trial of consecutive patients analyzed via patch tests as part of the study of possible allergic contact dermatitises collected prospectively within the Spanish Registry of Research in Contact Dermatitis and Cutaneous Allergy. The data was analyzed using 2 statistical tests: one homogeneity test (to describe the changes seen over time) and one trend test (to see whether the changes described followed a linear trend). RESULTS: A total of 11327 patients were included in the study. Overall, the allergens associated with a highest sensitization were nickel sulfate, methylisothiazolinone, cobalt chloride, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, and fragrance mix i. A statistically significant decrease was found in the percentage of methylisothiazolinone positive tests across the study years with an orderly trend. CONCLUSIONS: Although various changes were seen in the sensitizations trends to several allergens of the standard testing, it became obvious that a high sensitization to nickel, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone and fragrances mix i remained. Only a significant downward trend was seen for methylisothiazolinone.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Atópica , Humanos , Tiazóis , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 115(2): T150-T158, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38048951

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Prurido/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-Cego
7.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 115(2): 150-158, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37858860

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a new targeted therapy for severe atopic dermatitis (AD) with limited real-world evidence. OBJECTIVE: Explore our experience with dupilumab for AD in clinical practice at a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Unicentric observational retrospective study including adult and pediatric patients with severe AD receiving dupilumab between December 2017 and December 2021. The Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score, Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (P-NRS) and Sleep disturbance Numerical Rating Scale (S-NRS) were recovered to assess severity and response. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients received dupilumab: 52, 48, 26 and 13 patients reached 6, 12, 24 and 36 months of treatment, respectively. The EASI-75 response rates were 94.2%, 95.8%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI-90 response rates were 63.5%, 72.9%, 84.6% and 92.3% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The EASI <7 response rates were 92.3%, 91.7%, 88.5% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The P-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 86%, 87.5%, 92.3% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. The S-NRS ≥4 reduction rates were 82.7%, 85.4%, 100% and 100% at months 6, 12, 24 and 36. Adverse events were mild and occurred in 20.3% of patients, all of them adults. CONCLUSION: Our findings support dupilumab's favorable efficacy and tolerability profile in clinical practice. Dupilumab offers a rapid and sustained response, regardless of combined therapy. Longer follow-ups are still required to adequately assess its performance.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Adulto , Criança , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Prurido/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 113(3): 236-243, 2022 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35526918

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hand eczema is common in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD), but few studies have described the characteristics of these patients in large, representative populations from different geographic regions and occupational settings. OBJECTIVE: To describe the epidemiological, clinical, and allergy profile of patients with hand eczema who underwent patch testing and compare patients with and without AD. METHODS: Analysis of data from the Spanish Contact Dermatitis Registry, a multicenter registry of patients who undergo patch testing in Spain. RESULTS: We included 1466 patients with hand eczema who were patch tested between January 2018 and June 2020. Those with AD were younger and had had symptoms for longer before testing. They were also more likely to have been exposed to occupational triggers (38% vs 53% for patients without AD). The only profession for which significant differences were found was hairdressing. The most common allergens were nickel sulfate, methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone, cobalt chloride, potassium dichromate, fragrance mixes I and II, and formaldehyde. The most common diagnoses were allergic contact dermatitis (24% vs 31% in patients with and without AD, P=.0224) and irritant contact dermatitis (18% and 35% respectively, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: AD is common in patients with predominant hand eczema who undergo patch testing. Patients with hand eczema and AD have different clinical and epidemiological characteristics to hand eczema patients in general and their final diagnosis following patch testing is also different.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Dermatite Atópica , Eczema , Dermatoses da Mão , Alérgenos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatite Atópica/epidemiologia , Eczema/diagnóstico , Eczema/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/diagnóstico , Dermatoses da Mão/epidemiologia , Dermatoses da Mão/etiologia , Humanos , Testes do Emplastro , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos
10.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 113(6): 550-554, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35288101

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Rosacea is a chronic acneiform skin disorder in which impaired skin barrier function can lead to sensitization to allergens. We aimed to analyze contact allergies in our patients with rosacea. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent patch testing in our skin allergy clinic between May 1991 and May 2019. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients with rosacea were referred to our clinic for patch testing during the study period; they represented 2.1% of all patch tested patients in the period. Eighty-one percent were women (mean age, 44.7years). At least 1positive patch test was recorded for 46.5%; 15% were of current relevance. The most frequent positive reaction was to nickel (26%), followed by cobalt chloride (6.5%), isothiazolinones (6%), p-phenylenediamine (5.5%), fragrance mixII (5%), and thimerosal (3.5%). The most common currently relevant patch test reactions were to isothiazolinones in 10 of the 200 patients (5%); to phenylenediamine, fragrance mixII, and toluensulfonamide formaldehyde resin in 4 patients (2%) each; and to tixocortol and fragrance mixI in 2 patients (1%) each. The allergen groups most often implicated were metals (of current relevance in 12.6%) and drugs (of current relevance in 25.8%). Preservatives and fragrances were the next most common allergen groups, and 70.8% and 43.7% of the positive reactions in these groups, respectively, were of current relevance. Cosmetics were the most frequent source of sensitization, followed by topical medications - notably corticosteroids and antifungal agents. CONCLUSIONS: We emphasize the high prevalence of allergic contact dermatitis in patients with rosacea, a finding which supports patch testing, especially if eruptions worsen when these patients use cosmetics and topical medications.


Assuntos
Cosméticos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato , Rosácea , Adulto , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Feminino , Glucocorticoides , Humanos , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rosácea/epidemiologia
12.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 111(3): 249-253, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31864538

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The association between dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) and bullous pemphigoid (BP) has been demonstrated in several studies. The main aim of this study was to estimate the use of DPP-4i treatment in patients diagnosed with BP in our setting. METHODS: We selected patients histologically diagnosed with BP in our department between October 2015 and October 2018 and performed a retrospective chart review to assess clinical and epidemiological data and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) patterns. RESULTS: Of the 70 patients diagnosed with BP during the study period, 50% were diabetic and 88.57% of these were being treated with a DPP-4i when diagnosed with BP. The most common DPP-4i was linagliptin (used in 18.6% of patients), followed by vildagliptin (17.1%). The median latency period between initiation of DPP-4i treatment and diagnosis of BP was 27.5 months for all treatments, 16 months for linagliptin, and 39 months for vildagliptin (log rank < 0.01). A negative DIF result was significantly more common in patients not being treated with a DPP-4i. The DIF pattern most strongly (and significantly) associated with DPP-4i treatment was linear immunoglobulin G deposits along the dermal-epidermal junction. DPP-4i treatment was withdrawn in 87% of patients and 96% of these achieved a complete response. CONCLUSIONS: DPP-4i treatment is very common in patients with BP in our setting. The latency period between start of treatment and onset of BP seems to be shorter with linagliptin than with other types of gliptins. Patients receiving DPP-4i treatment may show different DIF patterns to those not receiving treatment.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV , Penfigoide Bolhoso , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Linagliptina/efeitos adversos , Penfigoide Bolhoso/induzido quimicamente , Estudos Retrospectivos , Vildagliptina
13.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) ; 111(1): 53-58, 2020 Jan 02.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31744595

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The epidemiology of genital herpes has changed in recent years with an increase in the incidence of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) infection. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients diagnosed with genital herpes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective observational study was designed. All patients diagnosed with genital herpes between January 2016 and January 2019 in a Sexually Transmitted Infections Unit (ITS) in Valencia, Spain, were included. RESULTS: We identified 895 STI diagnoses. Of these, 126 (14%) were genital herpes; 68 (54%) of these cases were in women and 58 (46%) in men. Diagnosis was confirmed by molecular detection of HSV DNA in 110 cases (87.3%). Of these, 52 were cases of HSV-1 infection (47.3%) and 58 were HSV-2 infection (52.7%). HSV-2 was more common in men (69.5%), while HSV-1 was more common in women (59.3%). In the subgroup of women, mean age at diagnosis was 26 years for HSV-1 and 34 years for HSV-2 (P=.015). Recurrent genital herpes rates were 13% for HSV-1 and 40% for HSV-2. CONCLUSIONS: There has been an increase in the number of cases of genital herpes caused by HSV-1 in our setting, with young women in particular being affected. This has important prognostic implications because genital herpes caused by HSV-1 is less likely to recur.


Assuntos
Herpes Genital/epidemiologia , Herpes Genital/virologia , Herpesvirus Humano 1 , Herpesvirus Humano 2 , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
16.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 108(6): 571-578, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28284423

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Few epidemiological studies have investigated the incidence of allergic contact dermatitis in children. Underdiagnosis has been observed in some studies, with many cases in which the condition is not suspected clinically and patch tests are not performed. However, the prevalence of pediatric sensitization to allergens has been reported to be as high as 20%, and the diagnosis should therefore be contemplated as a possibility in this age group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the skin allergy database of the Dermatology Department of Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. Children between 0 and 16 years of age diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis in the previous 15 years (between 2000 and 2015) were included in the analysis. Epidemiological (age, sex, history of atopy) and clinical (site of the lesions, allergen series applied, positive reactions, and their relevance) variables were gathered. RESULTS: Patch tests had been performed on 4,593 patients during the study period. Of these, 265 (6%) were children aged between 0 and 16 years. A positive reaction to at least one of the allergens tested was observed in 144 (54.3%) patients in that group. The allergens most frequently identified were the following (in decreasing order of frequency): thiomersal, cobalt chloride, colophony, paraphenylenediamine, potassium dichromate, mercury, and nickel. The sensitization was considered relevant in 177 (61.3%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the children studied showed sensitization to 1 or more allergens, with a high percentage of relevant sensitizations. All children with a clinical suspicion of allergic contact dermatitis should be referred for patch testing. As no standardized test series have been developed for this age group, a high level of clinical suspicion and knowledge of the allergens most commonly involved are required when selecting the allergens to be tested.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adolescente , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidade Imediata/epidemiologia , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Testes do Emplastro , Prevalência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos
17.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 107(4): 329-36, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26852369

RESUMO

The incidence of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) to cosmetics in the general population is rising with the increasing use of cosmetic products and their proliferation and diversification. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of ACD to cosmetics in our setting, analyze changes over time, describe the clinical and epidemiological features of this allergic reaction, and identify the allergens and cosmetics involved. We performed a prospective study at the skin allergy unit in Hospital General Universitario de Valencia in Spain between 2005 and 2013 and compared our findings with data collected retrospectively for the period 1996 to 2004. The 5419 patients who underwent patch testing during these 2 periods were included in the study. The mean prevalence of ACD to cosmetics increased from 9.8% in the first period (1996-2004) to 13.9% in the second period (2005-2013). A significant correlation was found between ACD to cosmetics and female sex but not atopy. Kathon CG (blend of methylchloroisothiazolinone and methylisothiazolinone), fragrances, and paraphenylenediamine were the most common causes of ACD to cosmetics during both study periods, and acrylates and sunscreens were identified as emerging allergens during the second period.


Assuntos
Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Adulto , Estudos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Centros de Atenção Terciária
18.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 39(4): 484-7, 2014 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24758493

RESUMO

Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCBL) of the elderly is a newly described lymphoproliferative disorder that arises in elderly patients without a predisposing immunodeficiency. Clinical features at presentation may include lymphadenopathy, B-symptoms and extranodal involvement. The main sites of extranodal involvement are the skin, lung, tonsil and stomach. Histopathological findings include atypical large lymphoid cells with variable amounts of reactive cells, such as small lymphocytes, plasma cells and histiocytes. The neoplastic cells are positive for CD20, and in situ hybridization for EBV-encoded RNA is positive in the majority of neoplastic cells. We present a new case of EBV-positive DLBCL in an 85-year-old man, who presented to our clinic with a 2-month history of asymptomatic cutaneous lesions involving his face and scalp.


Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/patologia , Neoplasias Faciais/virologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/virologia , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/virologia , Couro Cabeludo , Neoplasias Cutâneas/virologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Neoplasias Faciais/patologia , Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço/patologia , Humanos , Linfoma Difuso de Grandes Células B/patologia , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia
19.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 105(9): 854-9, 2014 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24679904

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Methylchloroisothiazolinone (MCI) and methylisothiazolinone (MI) are heterocyclic compounds used as preservatives in cosmetic and industrial products. They continue to be common allergens, causing positive patch test reactions in 2% to 4% of patients tested. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched the database at our skin allergy unit for all cases of sensitization to MCI/MI and MI diagnosed between January 1980 and March 2013. RESULTS: Patch tests were performed with MCI/MI in 8705 patients and with MI in 404 patients. In total, 222 patients (2.55%) were sensitized to MCI/MI and 21 (5.19%) were sensitized to MI. The incidence of MCI/MI cases peaked between 1998 and 2005 and again between 2009 and 2013. Of the 222 patients with MCI/MI sensitization, 142 were women (64%) and 49 were men (36%); the mean age was 43 years. The most frequently affected areas were the hands (54% of cases), the arms (36%), and the face (35%); 75.67% of cases were due to cosmetics and 2.25% were due to paint. Of the 21 patients with MI sensitization (mean age, 50 years), 12 were women (57%) and 9 were men (43%). The most common site of involvement in this group was the face (71% of cases), followed by the arms (38%) and the hands (29%). All the cases were due to cosmetics. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that sensitization to the combination of MCI and MI and MI alone has increased in recent years. It would appear to be necessary to add MI to the baseline patch test series, although the test concentration has yet to be determined.


Assuntos
Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/etiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/etiologia , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/efeitos adversos , Tiazóis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Alérgenos/efeitos adversos , Cosméticos/efeitos adversos , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite Alérgica de Contato/epidemiologia , Dermatite Ocupacional/diagnóstico , Dermatite Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pintura/efeitos adversos , Testes do Emplastro , Conservantes Farmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Espanha/epidemiologia , Tensoativos/efeitos adversos , Tiazóis/administração & dosagem
20.
Actas Dermosifiliogr ; 105(3): 300-4, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24661954

RESUMO

We present 7 cases of postsurgical contact dermatitis due to povidone iodine. The diagnosis was based on the clinical manifestations, the history of exposure, the site of the lesions, and the results of patch tests. This type of dermatitis can develop in the area of surgery or at distant sites exposed to povidone iodine during the surgical intervention. Patch tests with 10% povidone iodine in petrolatum were positive in all patients. Based on the results of the same tests in a control group, we recommend the use of petrolatum rather than water as the vehicle for the diagnosis of this form of contact dermatitis. Repeated open application tests with a commercially available solution of povidone iodine were negative. We conclude that the presence of the solution under occlusion during surgery is necessary both for the symptoms to develop and for the diagnosis to be made. This condition may be underdiagnosed.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos Locais/efeitos adversos , Dermatite de Contato/diagnóstico , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Povidona-Iodo/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Testes do Emplastro
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA